ArticlePlanta2026
GC content variation in angiosperm genomes reveals GC-biased gene conversion.
Article in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionThis study reveals the diversity of GC content characteristics among major angiosperm groups, with Poaceae species exhibiting significantly higher GC content and more pronounced heterogeneity. These features are likely associated with GC-biased gene conversion. Genome nucleotide composition critically shapes plant genetic diversity, yet its variation across angiosperms remains poorly understood. Here, we conducted a multilevel GC analysis across 495 angiosperm genomes (spanning 109 families, 44 orders; 284 species with annotated coding genes). Using SeqKit, we quantified GC content at whole-genome, chromosomal, gene, and codon scales, while estimating recombination rates with mlRho v2.9. We found that angiosperm GC content approximates a normal distribution (mean 36.64%) but varies markedly among lineages: monocots (41.97%) > eudicots (35.43%), with Poaceae highest (44.64%). Coding-region GC (mean 46.38%) exceeded genomic levels, showing maximal variation at the third codon position (GC3; mean 46.22%; up to 63.63% in Poaceae). Gene-level GC distributions shifted from unimodal to distinctly bimodal patterns-evident in Poaceae-reflecting divergence between high- and low-GC genes. Notably, GC content correlated positively with both chromosome length and recombination rate. These patterns are consistent with GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) as a key driver of GC diversity in angiosperms, operating neutrally and locally across genomic scales, independent of phylogeny.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41984235What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.