ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Exploiting prior knowledge in continuous decision-making under uncertainty: the case of tennis experts.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Badminton Players' Expert Advantage in Anticipation Based on Visual and Auditory Cues: Evidence from the Drift Diffusion Model.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leading theories of sensorimotor control propose that humans navigate uncertainty by integrating prior and sensory information in a Bayesian manner. However, empirical evidence is largely limited to static and constrained lab tasks. How humans exploit prior knowledge during continuously unfolding decision-making in naturalistic behavior remains unclear. Here, we study a task that pushes the human sensorimotor system to its limits: returning fast tennis serves. This task is particularly informative for gaining insights into the dynamics of unfolding decisions in action, owing to a distinct feature of the return movement: the split step—a preparatory movement characterized by a small jump to increase initial speed in the desired direction. In the experiment, experienced tennis players returned serves in an immersive extended reality setup with unconstrained movements and task demands matching real tennis. We manipulated the distributions of the opponent’s preferred serve locations (80% to the right vs. 20% to the left of the service box and vice versa in a second session). As a continuous behavioral readout of the evolving decision-making process, we measured participants’ weight shift during the unfolding action. Results show that, over the experiment, participants increasingly rely on acquired prior knowledge of the more probable serve direction to improve performance. Participants exploit prior knowledge by shifting their weight toward the more probable serve direction—already before the serve—while continuously re-evaluating both options based on incoming sensory information and motor costs. Using tennis as an exemplary case, our findings provide evidence that humans use prior and sensory information to probabilistically optimize continuous decision-making in complex sensorimotor behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.