Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984228›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Exploiting prior knowledge in continuous decision-making under uncertainty: the case of tennis experts.

Damian Beck, Ernst-Joachim Hossner, Stephan Zahno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Damian BeckUniversity of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 145, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland. damian.beck@unibe.ch.
Ernst-Joachim HossnerUniversity of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 145, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Stephan ZahnoUniversity of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 145, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leading theories of sensorimotor control propose that humans navigate uncertainty by integrating prior and sensory information in a Bayesian manner. However, empirical evidence is largely limited to static and constrained lab tasks. How humans exploit prior knowledge during continuously unfolding decision-making in naturalistic behavior remains unclear. Here, we study a task that pushes the human sensorimotor system to its limits: returning fast tennis serves. This task is particularly informative for gaining insights into the dynamics of unfolding decisions in action, owing to a distinct feature of the return movement: the split step—a preparatory movement characterized by a small jump to increase initial speed in the desired direction. In the experiment, experienced tennis players returned serves in an immersive extended reality setup with unconstrained movements and task demands matching real tennis. We manipulated the distributions of the opponent’s preferred serve locations (80% to the right vs. 20% to the left of the service box and vice versa in a second session). As a continuous behavioral readout of the evolving decision-making process, we measured participants’ weight shift during the unfolding action. Results show that, over the experiment, participants increasingly rely on acquired prior knowledge of the more probable serve direction to improve performance. Participants exploit prior knowledge by shifting their weight toward the more probable serve direction—already before the serve—while continuously re-evaluating both options based on incoming sensory information and motor costs. Using tennis as an exemplary case, our findings provide evidence that humans use prior and sensory information to probabilistically optimize continuous decision-making in complex sensorimotor behavior.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPsychomotor PerformanceTennisAdultBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMaleUncertaintyYoung AdultAffordance competition hypothesisAnticipatory behaviorBayesian inferenceDecision-makingExtended realityMotor control

Identifiers

PMID41984228
PMCPMC13083433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.