ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Association Between Intrapartum Papaverine Administration and the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clarifying the Role of Papaverine in Perineal Protection During Vaginal Delivery.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPerineal trauma during vaginal delivery may result in long-term morbidity. We aimed to test the hypothesis that intrapartum administration of papaverine is associated with a lower incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) among primiparous patients.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included primiparous patients with singleton term (> 37 weeks) pregnancies who delivered vaginally at Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel, between March 2020 and June 2024. Patients who received intrapartum 80 mg intramuscular papaverine were compared with those who did not. The primary outcome was the incidence of OASIS, defined as third- (3A, 3B, 3C) and fourth-degree perineal tears. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of first- and second-degree perineal tears and episiotomy. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of OASIS.
resultsAmong 4939 patients, 1082 (21.9%) received papaverine. Baseline demographics of the two groups were comparable; however, patients who received papaverine had a higher BMI and a higher rate of labor induction. The incidence of OASIS was significantly lower in the papaverine group (0.5% vs 1.3%; adjusted absolute risk difference [aRD] -0.7%, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.1; p = 0.016). First- and second-degree perineal tears were less frequent in univariate analysis (35.2% vs 39.2%, p = 0.019); however, after multivariable adjustment, this association was attenuated and no longer statistically significant (aRD -1.3%, 95% CI -4.1 to 1.5; p = 0.37). Episiotomy rates of the two groups were comparable.
conclusionsIn this study, primiparous patients who received intrapartum papaverine experienced a lower incidence of OASIS than those who did not receive papaverine. Further prospective, protocolized studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.