Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984204›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

A Feasibility Study of Hybrid Deep-Learning Prediction with Online Adaptation of Breathing Irregularities for Long-Term Internal Organ Motion During Radiotherapy.

Andrew Milewski, Uddin Fayed, Vyas Gupta, Xingyu Nie, Guang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew MilewskiDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Uddin FayedDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Vyas GuptaDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Xingyu NieDepartment of Radiology, Kentucky University College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Guang LiDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9022-2883

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionAlthough long short-term memory (LSTM) networks have been tested to predict short-term respiratory motion, their performance in long-term forecasting under breathing irregularities must be assessed. We aim to evaluate and enhance the long-term prediction of internal motion from an external surrogate using subject-specific LSTM models through a hybrid, adaptive approach.MethodsConcurrent internal navigator and external bellows respiratory-motion waveforms were acquired for ten volunteers during two four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) scans lasting 3-10 min each. Approximately 20 min intervened between the first (mid-term) and second (long-term) scan. After training on the first half of the mid-term data, subject-specific LSTM models were applied to the remaining mid-term and entire long-term datasets to predict internal waveforms. The accuracy of a model's prediction was assessed with Pearson's correlation (

Indexed as

Deep LearningRespirationFeasibility StudiesHumansLong Short Term MemoryMagnetic Resonance ImagingMovementPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning Modelsartificial intelligenceexternal-internal motion correlationLSTM and hybrid LSTM deep learningmotion management for treatment planningrespiratory motion prediction

Identifiers

PMID41984204
PMCPMC13087333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.