ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Multi-omics analysis of perfluorooctanoic acid and glioblastoma: insights from Mendelian randomization, network toxicology, and molecular docking.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most lethal primary brain tumor with limited treatment options. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a ubiquitous "forever chemical" classified as a group 1 carcinogen by the IARC, can cross the blood-brain barrier and accumulate in neural tissue. This study aimed to determine the causal relationship between genetically predicted higher circulating PFOA levels and GBM risk, elucidate underlying molecular mechanisms, and identify potential therapeutic targets using an integrated multi-omics framework. Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted using 23 single-nucleotide polymorphisms as instrumental variables. The outcome data were derived from the FinnGen consortium (endpoint C3_GBM, defined by ICD-O-3 morphology code 9440/3 with topography C71), with statistical analysis performed using SAIGE with saddlepoint approximation to address case-control imbalance. Network toxicology was applied to identify shared targets between PFOA and GBM, followed by protein-protein interaction network analysis and hub gene screening. The significance of gene set overlap was assessed using hypergeometric testing. Gene Ontology and KEGG enrichment analyses were performed on the full set of 86 overlapping genes to clarify biological pathways. Molecular docking assessed potential binding interactions between PFOA and hub proteins, and drug-target interaction analysis was conducted using the DGIdb database. MR analysis demonstrated a significant causal association between genetically predicted higher circulating PFOA levels and increased GBM risk (IVW OR = 2.64, 95% CI 1.13-6.20, p = 0.017), with no evidence of pleiotropy or heterogeneity. Network toxicology identified 86 overlapping targets (hypergeometric test p = 2.31 × 10⁻1⁸, OR = 3.12) and 9 hub genes (IL1B, MYC, BCL2, ALB, EGFR, ESR1, IL6, TNF, CASP3). Enrichment analyses of all 86 overlapping genes highlighted the AGE-RAGE signaling pathway, response to xenobiotic stimulus, chemical carcinogenesis-receptor activation, and positive regulation of glial cell proliferation. Molecular docking predicted potential PFOA binding to all hub proteins (binding energy < - 6.0 kcal/mol), with strongest affinities for MYC and TNF. Cisplatin emerged as the top drug repositioning candidate. This study provides the first genetic evidence supporting genetically predicted higher circulating PFOA levels as a causal risk factor for glioblastoma, potentially mediated by AGE-RAGE-driven neuroinflammation and oncogenic pathway activation, highlighting both environmental risk implications and therapeutic opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41984189What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.