ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2026
On the path for standardizing the assessment of masticatory performance : Evaluation of a new test method and development of support software.
Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occlusal function and masticatory efficiency of sagittal malocclusions: a cross-sectional cohort study of orthognathic therapy.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Five-year stability of occlusal function in orthognathic patients with sagittal malocclusions : Digital quantitative follow-up study.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRehabilitation of compromised masticatory function is a primary goal in orthodontics. Therefore, its assessment is essential for monitoring and validating treatment. However, current methods typically focus on a single feature, such as color homogeneity or texture of the test bolus, thereby, limiting their applicability. This study introduces a new open-source software that facilitates easier comparison of mixing ability metrics and evaluates the feasibility of two novel methods that combine color homogeneity, saturation, brightness, and texture.
methodsBicolor gum samples were chewed 10, 20, and 30 times by 15 participants with class I normocclusion. The boluses were processed using a standardized protocol and photographed under controlled conditions. The state-of-the-art standard deviation of Hue (SDHue) was compared with two new metrics: the Hue-Saturation-Value (HSV) metric, which combines hue, saturation, and brightness, and the Patch Expected Value (PEV) metric, which associates hue and texture. Their ability to discriminate between chewing trials and their intercorrelations were assessed.
resultsAll three metrics significantly discriminated between the three chewing conditions. The three metrics were correlated with one another across the entire dataset, with the lowest correlation between SDHue and HSV (r = 0.70). SDHue and PEV showed good to strong correlations across the 10×, 20×, and 30× cycle conditions (r = 0.62, 0.92, and 0.76, respectively).
conclusionThis study presents a reproducible methodology and the corresponding software for the objective assessment of masticatory performance. The combination of texture and color homogeneity appears feasible and promising, though further testing with finer mixing resolutions is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41984168What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.