ArticleWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research2026
Greywater treatment using treatment wetland systems - five cases from Northern Europe.
Article in Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment wetlands are widely used for greywater treatment in Europe, but upcoming stricter nutrient limits in the revised EU Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (EU 2024/3019) raise questions about their ability to meet future standards. This is especially relevant as interest increases in scaling systems beyond 1,000 PE and in reusing treated greywater, which under the EU Water Reuse Regulation (EU 2020/741) requires compliance with EU 2024/3019 effluent limits. To assess performance under these conditions, four greywater treatment wetlands and one mixed wastewater reference wetland were monitored for 18 months. All wetlands consistently produced dissolved COD below 50 mg/L, within the strictest limit of 125 mg COD/L. However, only three of the wetlands achieved total nitrogen concentrations below the required 6 mg N/L. Regarding total phosphorus, only the two wetlands, which used phosphorus adsorbing media, met the 0.5 mg P/L limit. Performance was not strongly linked to flow path design. Instead, lower nitrogen loading and use of phosphorus adsorbing media were associated with higher quality effluents. Other factors, including system age and groundwater interactions, showed no consistent influence across sites. Overall, results show that treatment wetlands can meet EU wastewater requirements for greywater, though nutrient removal may require targeted design strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41983987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.