Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41983985›Full record

ArticleWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research2026

Efficacy of biochar from mixed biomass resources for the removal of pharmaceutical residues from treated domestic wastewater.

Hadeel Hosney, Mostafa Elshourbagy, Thomas V Wagner, Eleonora L Borén, Piet N L Lens

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hadeel HosneyWater Supply, Sanitation and Environmental Engineering Department, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, Delft 2611 AX, The Netherlands E-mail: h.hosney@un-ihe.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3729-8942
Mostafa ElshourbagyMembrane Process Technology, Department of Membrane Science and Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5,Enschede 7522 NB, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2131-0679
Thomas V WagnerDepartment of Environmental Technology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8540-0123
Eleonora L BorénWater Supply, Sanitation and Environmental Engineering Department, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, Delft 2611 AX, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7715-2745
Piet N L LensWater Supply, Sanitation and Environmental Engineering Department, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, Delft 2611 AX, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5825-878X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biochar-based sorption has gained popularity for pharmaceutical residues removal; nonetheless, its performance is heavily dependent on feedstock selection, biomass characteristics, and operating conditions. Therefore, this study assesses the performance of biochar derived from several mixed biomass resources and addresses its applicability for use in nature-based treatment systems. Batch sorption studies were conducted on eight biochar types derived from softwood, bagasse, and coffee husk to assess their capacity to remove five pharmaceuticals. The experimental study was carried out in two phases. Phase 1 consisted of a screening, where softwood-bagasse biochar (50:50) was found to be the most efficient material among the eight chosen sorbents, with removal efficiencies of up to 97%. In phase two, response surface method (RSM) was employed to evaluate the individual and interactive effects of contact time, sorbent dose, and initial pharmaceutical concentration. The empirical statistical models revealed critical operational trade-offs, with removal efficiencies exceeding 90% at longer contact times (24-30 h) and higher biochar dosages (up to 2 g). The softwood-bagasse biochar's higher sorption performance was attributed to enhanced carbonization and aromaticity, as reflected by a low H/C ratio (0.31). This indicates that condensed carbon structure favours hydrophobic partitioning and π-π interactions with aromatic pharmaceutical molecules.

Indexed as

BiomassCharcoalWaste Disposal, FluidWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdsorptionPharmaceutical PreparationsbiocharCharcoalPharmaceutical PreparationsWastewaterWater Pollutants, Chemicalbiocharmixed-biomasspharmaceutical residuesreusewastewater effluent

Identifiers

PMID41983985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.