ArticleDevelopmental science2026
Contextualizing Socioeconomic Status Effects on Adolescent Brain Structure and Cognitive Skills: Evidence From the ABCD Study.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Youths' socioeconomic status (SES) correlates with academic, cognitive, and neural outcomes, partly driven by influences on the developmental environment not captured by caregiver income and education alone. Leveraging Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study data (M = 11.92 years; total n = 8,764), this study took an exploratory comparative approach, examining independent and interacting associations of SES indicators and home context qualities with neural structure and cognitive skills. Theory-driven analyses focused on the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), a key region for numerical and domain-general processing. Random forest regression (RFR) was used to evaluate results' brain-wide generalizability across 74 other cortical areas. Caregiver attentiveness and nightly sleep showed consistent positive associations with cognitive skills and IPS structure, respectively, controlling for SES and other home context factors. Interactions indicated that home learning emphasis and organization moderated SES associations with IPS morphology and cognitive skills. Data-driven analyses indicated that most associations identified with IPS morphology were moderate in strength rather than region-specific, with frontal and temporal cortical measures showing stronger links with SES. This work illustrates how data-driven approaches can complement theory-driven analyses by contextualizing the scope of theorized neural effects, an important check when modeling inherently complex developmental phenomena. Moreover, by directly comparing specific, potentially modifiable home context factors rather than focusing on SES indicators alone, such comparative approaches help clarify which factors may be most promising to prioritize in future intervention research. SUMMARY: Exploratory comparison of contextual factors as independent predictors and moderators of socioeconomic status (SES) associations with neural structure and cognition (ABCD; n = 8,764). Caregiver attentiveness and sleep quality were consistently associated with cognitive skills and intraparietal sulcus (IPS) morphology, respectively. Home organization and learning attitudes moderated SES associations. Machine learning sensitivity analyses suggest observed associations extend beyond the IPS to multiple cortical regions, supporting the relevance of SES-context analyses for understanding brain-wide effects. Integrating theory-driven regression with data-driven analyses reveals limits of region-specific models and underscores the value of distributed, computational approaches for more fully capturing developmental patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.