Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41983869›Full record

ReviewArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2026

Pouch cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis. Incidence, risk factors and literature review: a propos of three rare cases.

Fábio Guilherme Campos, Carlos Augusto Real Martinez, Renata Nobre Moura, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro, Carlos Frederico Sparapan Marques, Ulysses Ribeiro Junior, Paulo Herman

Abstract readReviewCase Reports
In one paragraph

Review in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fábio Guilherme CamposUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Gastroenterology Department, Colorectal Surgery Division - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6233-6904
Carlos Augusto Real MartinezUniversidade São Francisco, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences - Bragança Paulista (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8088-427X
Renata Nobre MouraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, São Paulo Cancer Institute, Digestive Endoscopy Unit - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0629-8050
Adriana Vaz Safatle-RibeiroUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7686-8859
Carlos Frederico Sparapan MarquesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Gastroenterology Department, Colorectal Surgery Division - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4293-6301
Ulysses Ribeiro JuniorUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-7347
Paulo HermanUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2859-5846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDevelopment of pouch cancer is a great challenge to both surgeons and patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC).

aimsWe aimed to present our experience with pouch cancer diagnosis and review literature data regarding incidence and associated risk factors.

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled FAP patients undergoing RPC between 1981 and 2023 in our academic institution. It included only J-pouch stapled patients with at least three years of follow-up. Patients' demographics and disease features were retrieved.

resultsAfter excluding seven patients, we selected 87 RPC, and three cases (3.4%) of pouch cancer were identified. They were diagnosed in three men aged 23-40 years at RPC and 41-62 years at cancer diagnosis. Interval from RPC to pouch cancer diagnosis varied from 11.6 to 20 years (average 14.6 years). All patients had colorectal cancers (CRC) detected in the specimen from the index surgery, two of them with multicenter lesions. A brief review of the literature series showed that pouch cancer has been detected in incidences ranging from 0.8 to 3.4%. Male sex, CRC in the RPC specimen, pouch phenotype during follow-up and an association with duodenal adenomas are considered risk factors.

conclusionsPouch cancer is a rare event associated with specific risk factors. After RPC, all patients should undergo endoscopic surveillance, with special attention to those who develop an aggressive phenotype during the first decade of follow-up. CENTRAL MESSAGE: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant disease associated with mutations in the APC gene. As a dominantly inherited cancer-predisposing syndrome, the main challenge of FAP management is the significant risk of CRC that requires prophylactic colectomy in a timely manner aiming to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) risk while maintaining quality of life. Cancer prevention is most usually accomplished through restorative procedures such as total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) or a restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis (RPC). The development of ileoanal pouch cancer is not so common in patients with FAP, even in specialized centers. PERSPECTIVES: Pouch cancer is a rare disease diagnosed in incidences varying from 0.8 to 3.4% in worldwide FAP series. Male patients, presence of CRC in the RPC specimen, colorectal phenotype, and association with duodenal adenomas are considered the main risk factors. Pouch adenomas develop after both hand-sewn or stapled anastomosis. Pouch polypectomy might prevent the development of adenocarcinomas, as patients under surveillance are diagnosed with more localized diseases.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis ColiColonic PouchesIleal NeoplasmsProctocolectomy, RestorativeAdultHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41983869
PMCPMC13089863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.