ArticleCoDAS2026
Cortical auditory evoked potential with different speech stimuli in children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection.
Article in CoDAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo characterize cortical auditory evoked potentials with speech stimuli in children with asymptomatic CMV infection compared to non-infected children with typical development of hearing, speech, and language.
methodsThe sample included 23 children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection and 16 control children, matched by age, sex, head circumference, and socioeconomic status. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials were recorded using speech stimuli /da/ and /ga/ at 70 dB SPL, with electrodes placed at the vertex (Cz), forehead (Fpz), and earlobes (A1 and A2). The presence of components was analyzed and compared between groups using descriptive and inferential statistics.
resultsThe analysis of the waves indicated that the control group showed neural responses closer to those observed in mature auditory pathways, with the presence of N1 and P2 in the formation process, evidenced by clearer wave morphology. Regarding latency, significantly higher values were observed in the control group for the /ga/ syllable. The CMV group exhibited higher amplitudes for the N2 component, indicating greater neural effort in auditory stimulus discrimination.
conclusionChildren with asymptomatic cytomegalovirus may have alterations in central auditory processing with differences in detection and discrimination of acoustic cues compared to the control group. Cortical auditory evoked potentials are a tool to assess these alterations, and further research is needed to understand the effects of CMV infection on central auditory development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.