Observational studyCoDAS2026
Language development of premature children followed up in an outpatient clinic: a preliminary study.
Observational study in CoDAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo verify the association between language development and sociodemographic, peri- and postnatal aspects of children with a history of prematurity followed up in an outpatient clinic.
methodsThis was an observational, analytical, cross-sectional, and preliminary study comprising 61 preterm infants aged between 12 months (corrected age) and 65 months (chronological age). Language development was assessed using the raw scores of the ADL-2 Scale in receptive, expressive, and global modalities. Sociodemographic, peri-, and postnatal information was obtained through medical record analysis. Data were subjected to descriptive, association, and correlation analyses.
resultsDescriptive analysis indicated lower language scores among male children, those from lower socioeconomic classes, those born via cesarean delivery, and those with a history of intracranial hemorrhage. No statistically significant associations or correlations were found.
conclusionAlthough no statistically significant associations were observed, the descriptive findings suggest possible influences of sex, socioeconomic status, mode of delivery, and intracranial hemorrhage on the language performance of preterm infants. The results reinforce the importance of considering multiple factors in the language development of preterm children, suggesting longitudinal follow-up for timely interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.