Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41983806›Full record

ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026

Impact of peripheral muscle strength on extubation success after cardiac surgery.

Júlio Adriano Leal de Bittencourt Carvalho, Maria Beatriz Sampaio Santana, André Luiz Lisboa Cordeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Júlio Adriano Leal de Bittencourt CarvalhoCentro Universitário Nobre, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8577-9346
Maria Beatriz Sampaio SantanaCentro Universitário Nobre, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2926-1312
André Luiz Lisboa CordeiroCentro Universitário Nobre, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8126-8644

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effects of peripheral muscle strength on extubation success after cardiac surgery.

methodsIn this prospective cohort study, peripheral muscle strength and Rapid Shallow Breathing Index were assessed at 30 and 10 minutes during a spontaneous breathing trial. Patients were extubated and monitored for 48 hours to verify the success or failure of extubation, and preoperative variables were compared.

resultsA total of 66 patients were evaluated, 55 (83%) of whom were classified as successful and 11 (17%) as weaning failures. The Medical Research Council score 30 minutes before the spontaneous breathing trial demonstrated a cut-off value of 44, with a sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 84%, area under the curve of 0.864, and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.69-1.00. The Medical Research Council score 10 minutes before the spontaneous breathing trial showed a cut-off value of 49, with a sensitivity of 55%, specificity of 80%, area under the curve of 0.845, and 95%CI= 0.77-1.00. The Rapid Shallow Breathing Index assessed 10 minutes before the spontaneous breathing trial had a cut-off value of 45, with a sensitivity of 30%, specificity of 70%, area under the curve of 0.476, and 95%CI= 0.22-0.71.

conclusionPeripheral muscle strength may be a useful predictor of extubation success in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationCardiac Surgical ProceduresMuscle StrengthVentilator WeaningAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41983806
PMCPMC13128246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.