ArticleBrazilian dental journal2026
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of glaze application protocols on surface roughness, translucency, and fatigue behavior of a lithium disilicate-based ceramic (CEREC Tessera, Dentsply, Germany). Discs (A2 HT shade; Ø = 10 mm; thickness = 1 mm) were fabricated and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 7 for roughness and translucency; n = 12 for fatigue): CTRL (crystallization only), CCG (combined crystallization/glaze firing), and C+G (crystallization followed by additional glaze firing). Surface roughness (Ra, Rz) was measured using a contact profilometer, and translucency (TP00) was calculated from CIEDE2000 color coordinates. The ΔTP between groups was also determined. Specimens were cemented to glass fiber reinforced epoxy resin discs and subjected to cyclic fatigue testing under water immersion until failure. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests were used for roughness and translucency, and Kaplan-Meier with Mantel-Cox for fatigue. One fractured specimen per group was examined by SEM to assess crack initiation and propagation. Glazing increased surface roughness, as CCG and C+G showed higher Ra and Rz values compared to CTRL (p > 0.05). TP00 ranged from 27.12 (C+G) to 28.33 (CCG), with no significant differences. ΔTP values (0.30 for CCG, 0.91 for C+G) were below the perceptibility threshold. Fatigue performance differed among groups (p < 0.05), with C+G showing higher mean cycles to failure compared to CTRL and CCG, although fatigue failure load did not differ significantly. SEM analysis revealed fractures initiating at the cementation surface under tensile stress and propagating toward the occlusal surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.