Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41983771›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026

Parameter-Dependent Effects of Rose Bengal Photodynamic Antimicrobial Therapy on MRSA Inhibition and Corneal Cytokine Expression.

Alejandro Arboleda, Heather Durkee, Mariela C Aguilar, Jorge Maestre-Mesa, Felipe Echeverri Tribin, Brandon Chou, Nidhi Relhan, Nicholas Nolan, Cornelis Rowaan, Alex Gonzalez and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alejandro ArboledaOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Heather DurkeeOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Mariela C AguilarOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Jorge Maestre-MesaOcular Microbiology Laboratory, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Felipe Echeverri TribinOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Brandon ChouOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Nidhi RelhanOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Nicholas NolanOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Cornelis RowaanOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Alex GonzalezOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Karam AlawaOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Harry W FlynnOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Guillermo AmescuaOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Jean-Marie ParelOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Darlene MillerOcular Microbiology Laboratory, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the antimicrobial effect of rose bengal and riboflavin photodynamic antimicrobial therapy (PDAT) on clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates under varying photosensitizer concentrations, light conditions, and exposure times. Additionally, a pilot study was performed to evaluate cytokine responses in a human cornea epithelium model. Methods: Suspensions of six clinical MRSA isolates (four community and two health care associated) were prepared at 1.5 × 10⁶ colony-forming units/mL with different concentrations of rose bengal (0.2%/0.1%/0.05%/0.025%/0.0125%), riboflavin (0.2%/0.1%/0.05%), or water (control). Suspensions were plated on blood agar and exposed to four light conditions: dark, ambient light (15/30 minutes), or light-emitting diode irradiation (rose bengal = green, riboflavin = UV-A). Plates were incubated for 48 hours, and growth inhibition was assessed. IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 expression in corneal epithelial models was measured after exposure to MRSA and rose bengal PDAT. Results: All six MRSA strains were completely inhibited (100%) by PDAT with all rose bengal concentrations. Ambient light displayed variable inhibition, more pronounced at higher photosensitizer concentrations, while dark conditions produced no effect. Riboflavin did not inhibit MRSA. Cytokine responses were highest for IL-8, followed by IL-6. Rose bengal PDAT modulated the cytokine response. Conclusion: Rose bengal PDAT is an effective antimicrobial strategy against both community- and health care-associated MRSA. Rose bengal with ambient light is not recommended due to inconsistent efficacy in tested conditions. Riboflavin PDAT is ineffective under these conditions. MRSA increased cytokine production in corneal epithelial cells, and this response was modulated by PDAT. Translational Relevance: Rose bengal PDAT effectively suppresses MRSA and modulates inflammatory cytokines, supporting its use in microbial keratitis.

Indexed as

CorneaCytokinesMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsRose BengalEpithelium, CornealHumansPilot ProjectsRiboflavinStaphylococcal InfectionsCytokinesPhotosensitizing AgentsRiboflavinRose Bengal

Identifiers

PMID41983771
PMCPMC13094781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.