ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Deep Ensemble Learning to Detect Retinal Vascular Leakage on Ultrawide-Field Fundus Photographs of Patients With Uveitis.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a novel deep learning (DL) algorithm to detect retinal vascular leakage (RVL) on ultra-widefield fundus (UWF) images in patients with posterior segment uveitis. Methods: Ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFFA) and corresponding UWF images of patients, who were evaluated at the uveitis clinic at the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, were collected for this study. UWFFA images were used for the assessment of RVL, and the corresponding UWF images were used to train the algorithms. Several DL algorithms with different backbone architectures were trained and tested, and the ensemble learning (EL) method was adopted to enhance classification accuracy. Results: A total of 405 eyes were included in the study. Two different datasets were generated, wMildRVL (405 eyes) and woMildRVL (excluding mild RVL eyes). EL based on 3 DL models showed superior performance with an accuracy of 0.7704, a sensitivity of 0.7699, a specificity of 0.7713, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8018 for the dataset wMildRVL, and an accuracy of 0.7900, a sensitivity of 0.7819, a specificity of 0.8000, and an AUC of 0.8344 for the woMildRVL dataset. Conclusions: The proposed EL model demonstrated the potential in distinguishing those with and without RVL on UWF images from eyes with posterior segment uveitis. Translational Relevance: This algorithm model can be a potential screening tool to detect the presence of RVL on UWF images, thus determining the need for UWFFA, as this would be especially helpful in resource-limited settings or in patients with known adverse effects to the fluorescein dye.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.