Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41983683›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2026

Sweep and Scrutinize: Improving Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Efficacy by Combining Whole-Gland Contrast-Enhanced Transrectal Ultrasound With Fixed-Plane Flash-Replenishment Imaging.

Xiaoyuan Jiang, Zejun Zhao, Yangyi Li, Yutian He, Honglei Luo, Xuesong Liu, Jiayi Wang, Shaowei Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaoyuan JiangDepartment of Ultrasound, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8809-8611
Zejun ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Yangyi LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Yutian HeDepartment of Ultrasound, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Honglei LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Xuesong LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Jiayi WangDepartment of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Shaowei XieDepartment of Ultrasound, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6861-1316

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81901747National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272002Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 22ZR1438500Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 25ZR1402322Shanghai "Rising Stars of Medical Talents" Youth Talent Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate whether the addition of whole-gland contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CETRUS) and fixed-plane flash-replenishment imaging (FRI) to conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) improves the diagnostic efficacy of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 4.00-20.00 ng/mL.

methodsA total of 163 patients scheduled for TRUS-guided biopsy due to elevated PSA (4.00-20.00 ng/mL) were enrolled. Each patient underwent conventional TRUS, whole-gland CETRUS, and FRI before biopsy. Detection rates and diagnostic efficacy for PCa were compared among 3 imaging strategies: conventional TRUS alone, the combination of conventional TRUS with whole-gland CETRUS, and the triple combination.

resultsPCa was diagnosed in 62 of 163 (38.04%), including 29 (46.77%) clinically significant cases. The detection rates were 43.56% for conventional TRUS, 57.06% for conventional TRUS combined with whole-gland CETRUS, and 61.35% for the triple combination. Only 5 clinically insignificant cases were missed by the combined approach. The triple combination demonstrated the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.747), significantly outperforming conventional TRUS (AUC = 0.669, p = .018) and TRUS with whole-gland CETRUS (AUC = 0.703, p = .026). The combined method also identified significantly more positive biopsy cores (p-

conclusionThe triple-modality combination significantly improves PCa detection rate and diagnostic efficacy in patients with PSA levels of 4.00-20.00 ng/mL, offering a valuable alternative when magnetic resonance imaging is contraindicated or unavailable.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaImage EnhancementProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstateRectumReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyContrast Mediacontrast‐enhanced transrectal ultrasounddiagnostic efficacyflash‐replenishment imagingprostate cancertransrectal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41983683
PMCPMC13489659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.