Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41983602›Full record

SynthesisJournal of Crohn's & colitis2026

The predictive value of intestinal ultrasound for treatment response in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and pooled data analysis.

Johanna M B W Vos, Christoph Teichert, Floris A E De Voogd, Maarten J Pruijt, Faridi S Jamaludin, Geert R A M D'Haens, Marc A Benninga, Bart G P Koot, Krisztina B Gecse

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Johanna M B W VosDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0004-8166-7022
Christoph TeichertAmsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-3080-9806
Floris A E De VoogdDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4058-252X
Maarten J PruijtAmsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7457-8353
Faridi S JamaludinAmsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Medical Library AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geert R A M D'HaensDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc A BenningaDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart G P KootDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Krisztina B GecseDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a promising tool for predicting treatment response in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to systematically review existing literature on the predictive value of IUS for treatment response.

methodsA literature search was performed until May 2025. We included articles assessing treatment response in IBD using IUS. Data were analyzed separately for Crohn's Disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Pooled data analysis was performed for bowel wall thickness (BWT) in CD patients starting anti-TNF (tumor necrosis factor).

resultsIn total, 31 articles were included (18 CD, 9 UC, and 4 ASUC). In 8/10 CD studies, IUS at week 4-8 could distinguish future responders, with BWT change ranging from -43% to -14.6% in responders vs. -14% to + 2% in nonresponders. In the pooled data analysis of anti-TNF-treated CD patients (n = 236) a 23% decrease from baseline at week 4-8 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.82) and 27% decrease at week 12-16 (AUROC 0.78) could predict future response. In 2/2 UC studies, IUS after 4-8 weeks could predict future endoscopic remission vs. non-remission with a decrease in BWT ranging from -55% to -49% vs. -38% to -17% respectively. In ASUC, change in BWT after 1-3 days could predict need for salvage therapy (-34% vs. -10%).

conclusionsIntestinal ultrasound predicts response at an early stage after treatment initiation, both in CD as well as in UC. In anti-TNF-treated CD patients, 23% and 27% decrease in BWT after 4-8 weeks and 12-16 weeks of treatment initiation predicts outcomes.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseInflammatory Bowel DiseasesIntestinesHumansPredictive Value of TestsTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaUltrasonographyTumor Necrosis Factor-alphainflammatory bowel diseaseintestinal ultrasoundpredictive value

Identifiers

PMID41983602
PMCPMC13080699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.