Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41983590›Full record

ArticleResearch in nursing & health2026

Consensus-Based Safety Recommendations for Informal Home Care: A Mixed Methods Study.

Nida Abed, Vanessa Ribeiro Neves, Valerie Matarredona Perez, Daniel Monasor Ortola, Virginia Ferrer García, Bojana Knezevic, Paulo Sousa, Reinhard Strametz, Mercedes Guilabert, José Joaquín Mira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in nursing & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nida AbedFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7492-2967
Vanessa Ribeiro NevesFederal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Valerie Matarredona PerezFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0419-3600
Daniel Monasor OrtolaDenia Health District, Alicante, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9346-0853
Virginia Ferrer GarcíaDenia Health District, Alicante, Spain.
Bojana KnezevicUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Paulo SousaPublic Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Lisbon, Portugal.
Reinhard StrametzWiesbaden Institute for Healthcare Economics and Patient Safety (WiHelP), RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Mercedes GuilabertDepartment of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain.
José Joaquín MiraFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.

Funding

COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) CA22152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As home-based care expands globally, informal caregivers are responsible for medical and nursing responsibilities, raising serious concerns about safety and risk management. This study proposes expert-informed, safety recommendations tailored to informal caregiving in home settings. The study used a six-phase mixed methods design combining a Consensus Development Conference (CDC) process with elements of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). In the first five phases, 13 healthcare professionals, hereafter referred to as "the professionals" (10 nurses, one physician, one occupational therapist, and one social worker), engaged in deliberations and risk assessments. The professionals agreed on 15 caregiving domains such as medication administration, mobility, and caregiver well-being, mapped them to 53 home caregiving procedures, identified 160 potential failure modes (errors), and rated the effect severity of each failure mode. This process led to the development of an initial set of 450 safety recommendations. In the final phase, a multidisciplinary expert review conducted by the research team merged overlapping items, eliminating redundancies and ensuring accuracy, confirming 53 procedures, 147 distinct failure modes (errors), refining 213 procedure failure mode effect associations, and consolidating the corpus to 288 recommendations. The resulting recommendations are intended to guide the development of safety guidance for informal caregiving in home settings. These recommendations are considered expert-derived guidance, since end users did not participate in the study.

Indexed as

CaregiversConsensusHome Care ServicesPatient SafetyHumansconsensus recommendationshome careinformal caregiverspatient safetyrisk management

Identifiers

PMID41983590
PMCPMC13539635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.