ArticleChemistry & biodiversity2026
Screening the Chemical Composition, Antioxidant Activity, and Toxicity of Ten Species of Non-Conventional Food Plants From Southern Brazil.
Article in Chemistry & biodiversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Screening the Chemical Composition, Antioxidant Activity, and Toxicity of Ten Species of Non-Conventional Food Plants From Southern Brazil.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-conventional food plants (NCFPs) are resilient, adaptable species with nutritional qualities. Brazil has the world's greatest biodiversity in these species. Despite evidence of their potential for sustainable nutrition, there are few related studies. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the antioxidant capacity, total polyphenol content, main compounds, and in vivo toxicity of ten NCFPs from southern Brazil. The results showed that the NCFP extracts presented considerable variability in antioxidant activity. Notably, ABTS scavenging ranged from 21.70% ± 0.84% to 99.54% ± 0.01%, whereas DPPH values ranged from 56.88 ± 2.32% to 95.10 ± 1.09%. Total phenolic content varied between 24.43 ± 1.35 and 260.38 ± 12.92 mg GAE g
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.