Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41983382›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2026

Assessment of Pain Intensity Using Deep Learning Models in Non-Communicative Intensive Care Patients.

Suzan Guven, Fatma Eti Aslan, Murat Canayaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suzan GuvenDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8015-7870
Fatma Eti AslanDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bahçeşehir University, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0965-1443
Murat CanayazDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-5101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is a multifaceted and subjective phenomenon frequently experienced by patients in intensive care units. In non-communicating populations, conventional assessment tools are often inadequate and susceptible to observer bias. Deep learning-based facial analysis has emerged as a promising approach for the objective quantification of observable pain-related behavioural indicators.

aimTo evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of deep-learning models in categorising pain severity in non-communicative adult intensive care patients, using expert-annotated facial images. STUDY

designFeatures were extracted via the DenseNet-169 architecture, dimensionally reduced with principal component analysis and classified using support vector machine, random forest and K-nearest neighbours. Data sets were independently annotated by a multidisciplinary team comprising an intensivist, intensive care nurses and a pain specialist. Model performance was comprehensively assessed through accuracy, precision, sensitivity, the F1 score, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Fleiss' kappa coefficient to ensure robust inter-rater reliability.

resultsA total of 636 facial images obtained from 120 adult intensive care unit patients were analysed. The support vector machine model achieved the highest overall performance, with an accuracy of 96.9% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.994, demonstrating exceptional sensitivity in severe pain classification. While K-nearest neighbours showed superior performance for moderate pain detection, random forest yielded the lowest accuracy across all data sets. Notably, inter-rater agreement was low (k = 0.16), highlighting the significant variability in expert human judgements and the subjective nature of manual pain assessment.

conclusionsDeep learning-based facial analysis provides a valid, reproducible and standardised method for pain assessment in non-verbal intensive care patients. The creation of a multi-expert annotated data set and the systematic comparison of classifiers across diverse clinical perspectives represent the original contributions of this study. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Automated facial expression analysis minimises inter-observer variability by providing an objective decision support mechanism for critical care nurses. This technology facilitates the standardisation of pain management protocols and bolsters patient safety by reducing the inherent risks of subjective assessment bias.

Indexed as

Critical CareDeep LearningPain MeasurementAdultFacial ExpressionFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSupport Vector Machineartificial intelligencedeep learningfacial expression analysisintensive carenon‐communicating patientpain assessment

Identifiers

PMID41983382
PMCPMC13080763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.