ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2026
Rapid Identification of Edible Insect Species in Food Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry.
Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleEdible insects are emerging as sustainable, nutritious 'foods of the future' and are gradually introduced to the European market as novel foods. Ensuring consumer safety and preventing fraud requires legal regulation, which in turn depends on reliable analytical methods. Sensitive, rapid techniques capable of identifying insect species are needed to support enforcement and monitoring of legislation across different food matrices.
methodsPowders of 10 insect species, including all four edible insects authorised as novel foods in the European Union, were digested with trypsin without toxic extraction agents. Samples were purified using ZipTip C
resultsSix model mixtures and 10 commercial products were authenticated using previously created genus- and species-specific m/z databases. Model mixtures with dominant insect proteins allowed correct genus- and species-level identification (7-20% peptide matches). Closely related species or dominant spectral components increased the misidentification. In the commercial products, identification was adequate for high-insect-content samples, but species assignment was ambiguous or incorrect in products with low insect content (7-10%) and high plant protein content.
conclusionsMALDI-TOF MS enables rapid genus-level insect identification and species-level discrimination, especially when dealing with unprocessed single-species powders. Accurate species assignment depends on insect abundance and matrix complexity of the inspected products. As well, the use of MALDI-TOF MS for species identification of products with low insect content or high plant protein is still limited and may require complementary methods such as LC-MS/MS to achieve unambiguous species identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.