ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2026
The registration status of maternal, newborn, and child health medical products: evidence from 9 countries.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Access to essential medicines for mothers and children: regulatory challenges and gender justice.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Registration challenges in resource-limited countries can compromise the availability of life-saving maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) medical products - quality-assured generic products may not be registered or renewed. Methods: To identify barriers, we assessed the registration status of MNCH tracer medicines in 9 countries through document review and interviewed country regulators and 11 pharmaceutical manufacturers using structured questionnaires. Results: On average, 72% of the tracer medicines had at least one registered product across the 9 countries (ranging from 28% to 100%). Some countries only had one or two registered products for some MNCH tracer medicines. Five countries had not registered any of the four World Health Organization-prequalified products. The average registration timeline ranged from six months to four years due to national regulatory authority backlogs and complicated procedures. Only two countries officially recognised regulatory decisions from other countries' Good Manufacturing Practices inspections. No country had formal processes embedded in legislative provisions to prioritise and expedite registration of essential MNCH medical products. Discussion: Solutions to registration impediments involve legal, organisational, and procedural changes. MNCH medicines have specific challenges including low profit margins due to the ease of production and variety of manufacturers; additionally, an inconvenient registration process is a disincentive for manufacturers. Likewise, procurers who are more price than quality conscious may not procure costlier prequalified medicines. Registration catalysts include streamlining the process with electronic management information systems providing market information, maintaining qualified staffing, and emphasising reliance on and recognition of other regulatory authority decisions. Conclusion: Some life-saving MNCH products are not available because national registration processes are flawed. Consequently, governments and donors must invest in changes to streamline procedures to register vital medicines to protect the health of women and children. To maximise health outcomes, countries should prioritise the registration of products of public health importance, including MNCH medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.