ArticleRSC advances2026
Mechanism of the reduced shock sensitivity of CL-20/MTNP co-crystals from reactive molecular dynamics simulations.
Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elucidating the reasons for the reduced shock sensitivity of 2,4,6,8,10,12-hexanitro-2,4,6,8,10,12-hexaazaisowurtzitane/1-methyl-3,4,5-trinitropyrazole (CL-20/MTNP) compared with CL-20 is crucial for understanding the shock initiation of CL-20/MTNP co-crystalline explosives. In this study, molecular dynamics based on the ReaxFF-lg reactive force field was employed to simulate the propagation of the shock wavefront in the CL-20/MTNP co-crystal and corresponding single crystals. Thermodynamic properties and initial chemical reactions were analyzed using in-house programs. The results indicated that the pressure and temperature at the shock wavefront in the CL-20/MTNP co-crystal were not significantly different from those in the CL-20 crystal. During low- and medium-velocity impacts, the reactant molecules of the CL-20/MTNP co-crystal decayed slower than those of the corresponding single crystals. However, during high-velocity impacts, the decay rates of reactant molecules in the three crystals were similar. After the shock wavefront passed through, multiple CL-20 molecules of the CL-20 crystal simultaneously generated a large amount of NO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.