ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Case Series of Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap Reconstruction in Rwanda.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The anterolateral thigh free flap is a versatile reconstructive option for lower limb and head and neck defects. It provides a large skin paddle with a reliable vascular pedicle-the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery-and is ideal for covering complex soft tissue defects. Its minimal donor site morbidity, along with the option to include muscle or fascia, makes it a versatile choice for reconstruction of various anatomical sites. Methods: All 3 patients included in this case series were selected after assessing that their defects could not be covered with local flaps. A detailed history was obtained for each patient, including smoking status, diabetes, and other vascular diseases, along with any prior radiotherapy. Computed tomography angiography was performed for every patient to confirm that the recipient vessels are patent, along with the standard preoperative workup. Results: The 3 patients who presented, 1 for a scalp basal cell carcinoma defect postexcision and 2 with left leg defect for coverage of exposed and fractured left tibia following trauma, demonstrated good clinical outcomes. None of the patients required a return to the operating room for microvascular compromise, and there were no instances of flap necrosis, or congestion. However, all patients reported postoperative flap fullness, which may necessitate flap debulking in the future. Conclusions: This case series is not intended to draw definitive conclusions regarding the use of the free anterolateral thigh flap, but rather, the cases are presented to illustrate local microsurgical capacity made possible through international collaboration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.