SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Safety and efficacy of anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies as second-line therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Correlation of Local Nasal Biomarkers and Olfactory Dysfunction in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Pooled it
- Integration of transcriptomics and machine learning to explore inflammatory characteristics and key oxidative stress-related molecules in nasal polyps.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody (anti-IL-5 mAb) as a second-line therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Materials and methods: Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library) were searched from the establishment of the databases to September 15, 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-IL-5 mAb versus placebo in the treatment of CRSwNP. The primary outcome measure of this meta-analysis were nasal polyp score (NPS) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) score. Secondary outcome measures included nasal blockage score (NBS), loss of smell score (LSS), Lund-Mackay score (LMS), University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) score, nasal overall visual analog scale(VAS) score, nasal composite visual analog scale(VAS) score, number of first-time NP surgery patients and number of systemic corticosteroids (≥1 course) patients. Results: Totally 10 RCTs were included for meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, anti-IL-5 mAb provided a significantly lower NPS (WMD = -0.58, 95%CI: -0.70 ~ -0.46, P < 0.00001, I Conclusions: This results confirmed that anti-IL-5 mAb therapy was safe and effective for CRSwNP and can serve as a second-line therapy. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251170717.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.