ArticleEuropean heart journal open2026
Evaluation after delayed and repeated intervention in the VIPVIZA-extended randomized controlled trial: beneficial results 6 years after baseline.
Article in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01849575 (Direct VIsualiZAtion of Asymptomatic Atherosclerotic Disease for Optimum Cardiovascular Prevention. A Population Based Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial Within Västerbotten Intervention Programme), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Direct VIsualiZAtion of Asymptomatic Atherosclerotic Disease for Optimum Cardiovascular Prevention. A Population Based Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial Within Västerbotten Intervention Programme (VIP) and Ordinary Care.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The Västerbotten Intervention Programme VIsualiZation of subclinical Atherosclerosis (VIPVIZA) pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) previously reported reduced cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk 3 years after colour-coded information about subclinical atherosclerosis based on carotid ultrasonography and facilitated by nurse-led motivational dialogue. This report evaluated the development of CVD risk and clinical risk factors following the 3-year follow-up, at which point the control group received their first delayed intervention and the intervention group received a repeated VIPVIZA intervention. Methods and results: Participants ( Conclusion: When the delayed VIPVIZA intervention was provided to the control group after 3 years, the beneficial effect appeared similar as previously reported for the intervention group. After 6 years, any differences between groups in CVD risk were no longer seen. Cholesterol levels were greatly reduced in both groups. Registration: The VIPVIZA trial is registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01849575).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.