Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41983110›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026

The sarcopenia-pain connection: why mechanisms matter for patient care?

Giovanni Iolascon, Antimo Moretti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giovanni IolasconMultidisciplinary Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Antimo MorettiMultidisciplinary Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcopenia and pain are two highly prevalent conditions in aging populations, each exerting profound effects on mobility, independence, and quality of life. Emerging evidence demonstrates that these conditions are not merely coincidental but are closely interconnected through shared biological, mechanical, and neurophysiological pathways. Pain reduces physical activity, accelerates muscle wasting, and fosters functional decline, while sarcopenia increases vulnerability to painful syndromes such as osteoarthritis, fragility fractures, and low back pain. This bidirectional relationship is further amplified by chronic low-grade inflammation ("inflammaging"), mitochondrial dysfunction, and central sensitization, creating a vicious cycle of musculoskeletal fragility and disability. Despite robust epidemiological data, current diagnostic frameworks for sarcopenia fail to integrate pain dimensions, risking misclassification and underestimation of disease burden. Novel screening approaches that combine anthropometric measures with validated pain assessments may improve case finding and clinical management. This narrative review synthesizes epidemiological insights, mechanistic links, and diagnostic challenges, and advocates for integrated strategies that simultaneously target muscle health and pain management. Recognizing pain as both a determinant and consequence of sarcopenia is essential to advancing prevention, rehabilitation, and multidisciplinary care in older adults.

Indexed as

agingexercisenutritionpainrehabilitationsarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID41983110
PMCPMC13070926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.