ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Effect of a multidisciplinary nutrition care model integrating health education and individualized nutritional support on physical function and nutritional outcomes in patients with advanced malignant tumors: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malnutrition is highly prevalent among patients with advanced malignant tumors and is associated with impaired physical function, reduced treatment tolerance, and poor prognosis. Structured, individualized nutritional strategies may improve clinical outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the effects of a nurse-led, multidisciplinary nutritional intervention model on nutritional status, immune function, quality of life, and patient satisfaction in individuals with advanced malignancies. Methods: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, 96 patients with stage III-IV malignant tumors were randomly assigned (1:1) to a control group (routine hospital nutritional care) or an intervention group receiving the nurse-led, multidisciplinary nutritional intervention model. The intervention incorporated systematic nutritional risk screening (PG-SGA), individualized caloric calculation using the Harris-Benedict equation, protocol-driven enteral/parenteral nutrition strategies, standardized immunonutrition when indicated, structured patient education, and dynamic multidisciplinary monitoring. The primary outcome was total clinical response rate at 1 month. Secondary outcomes included nutritional indices (PNI, NRI, NAI), biochemical markers (Hb, ALB, PALB, TFN), immune markers (IgA, IgG, IgM), SF-36 quality-of-life scores, and patient satisfaction. Results: After one month, the group receiving the nurse-led, multidisciplinary nutritional intervention model demonstrated a significantly higher total clinical response rate compared with routine care [95.83% vs. 79.17%, risk ratio 1.21 (95% CI 1.04-1.41), Conclusion: The nurse-led, multidisciplinary nutritional intervention model significantly improves short-term nutritional status, immune preservation, quality of life, and patient satisfaction in patients with advanced malignant tumors. Larger multicenter trials with long-term follow-up are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.