ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Exploring thematic dimensions of breast pumping discussions in an online community using large language models and multiple correspondence analysis.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast pumping is a central part of infant feeding for many parents, yet professional guidance often gives limited attention to psychosocial and experiential aspects. Online communities offer valuable insight into how parents describe and navigate these experiences. Large language models provide new opportunities to analyze large volumes of online discussions. Objective: To identify and describe major thematic patterns in online discussions about breast pumping and infant feeding, with a focus on sensory concerns related to stored milk and their links to parental distress. Methods: Four subreddits related to pumping and breastfeeding were selected, and 107,447 relevant posts, extracted from November 2010 to December 2024, were retained in the analysis. Relevant content was identified using a combination of keyword matching and semantic similarity. Eleven binary-coded questions covering practical, experiential, and psychosocial topics were developed. Llama 3.1 8B was used for systematic classification. Ten questions achieving classification accuracy above 75% were retained. Multiple correspondence analysis was used to explore underlying thematic dimensions. A Supplementary keyword co-occurrence analysis examined discussions of sensory changes in stored milk. Results: Four main dimensions were identified, explaining 52.5% of total variance. Dimensions 1 (16.2%) and 2 (13.6%) differentiated discussions focused on feeding decisions and emotional experiences from those explicitly addressing sensory changes in expressed milk. Dimensions 3 (11.8%) and 4 (10.9%) distinguished concerns about perceived effects of pumping on milk quality from practical and work-related aspects of pumping. In Conclusion: These findings suggest gaps in current guidance on milk storage and quality and highlight the need for more targeted support and interventions for pumping parents. Although sensory changes in stored breastmilk were mentioned relatively infrequently, they emerged as a distinct theme in pumping-related discussions. The frequent co-occurrence of lipase concerns with frozen milk stashes reflects a recurring situation in which parents discover sensory changes only after substantial effort has been invested in building a stored milk supply.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.