Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41982997›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science and technology2026

Hastening meat production: a review of growth promoters for traditional and cultured meat production.

Ermie Buen Mariano, Da-Young Lee, Ji Won Park, Seok Namkung, So Young Choi, Chae Hyeon Bok, Woojin Lee, Yewon Shin, Colin Venter, Sun Jin Hur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ermie Buen MarianoDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2630-4603
Da-Young LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-0815
Ji Won ParkDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9500-5763
Seok NamkungDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4533-7971
So Young ChoiDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6034-4745
Chae Hyeon BokDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8668-8172
Woojin LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5946-601X
Yewon ShinDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2758-9238
Colin VenterDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4142-5809
Sun Jin HurDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9386-5852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time is an intangible yet important element in food production systems. It is often used as one of the bases for technology and production efficiency, with shorter production durations being favored. Meat is a staple source of protein for the human diet; therefore, efforts to improve and optimize production efficiency are always warranted. Growth promoters in traditional meat production are additives used to improve the performance and productivity of livestock animals while the enhancement of proliferation, differentiation, and maintenance capacity of cells are prioritized in cultured meat production. Although often put in opposition to each other, traditional and cultured meat share a common purpose of providing meat and its products for food security. This review provides insight into the previous and current growth promoters used in both meat production systems. Differences in traditional meat and cultured meat production, in terms of nutrient allocation and production period, were given emphasis. Potential effects of shortened meat production duration to the environment were also discussed. In both production systems, plant-derived growth promoters are commonly used to improve production efficiencies and food safety, particularly in terms of antimicrobial resistance, hormonal residues, and toxicity. Antioxidants play an important role in both meat production and myogenesis, supporting animal and cell growth. Shortened production duration due to growth promoters can generally lead to lower production costs, as well as result in the commercialization and price competitiveness of traditional and cultured meat products.

Indexed as

Cultured meatFood safetyGrowth promotersProduction efficiencyTraditional meat

Identifiers

PMID41982997
PMCPMC13071691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.