ReviewJournal of animal science and technology2026
Hastening meat production: a review of growth promoters for traditional and cultured meat production.
Review in Journal of animal science and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time is an intangible yet important element in food production systems. It is often used as one of the bases for technology and production efficiency, with shorter production durations being favored. Meat is a staple source of protein for the human diet; therefore, efforts to improve and optimize production efficiency are always warranted. Growth promoters in traditional meat production are additives used to improve the performance and productivity of livestock animals while the enhancement of proliferation, differentiation, and maintenance capacity of cells are prioritized in cultured meat production. Although often put in opposition to each other, traditional and cultured meat share a common purpose of providing meat and its products for food security. This review provides insight into the previous and current growth promoters used in both meat production systems. Differences in traditional meat and cultured meat production, in terms of nutrient allocation and production period, were given emphasis. Potential effects of shortened meat production duration to the environment were also discussed. In both production systems, plant-derived growth promoters are commonly used to improve production efficiencies and food safety, particularly in terms of antimicrobial resistance, hormonal residues, and toxicity. Antioxidants play an important role in both meat production and myogenesis, supporting animal and cell growth. Shortened production duration due to growth promoters can generally lead to lower production costs, as well as result in the commercialization and price competitiveness of traditional and cultured meat products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.