ReviewTranslational pediatrics2026
Positive end-expiratory pressure in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a narrative review.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can support alveolar recruitment, improve oxygenation, and mitigate ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Despite its central role in lung-protective ventilation, evidence to guide PEEP titration in PARDS remains limited. This review summarizes physiologic principles, existing evidence, and bedside strategies for PEEP management in children. Methods: We performed a narrative review using PubMed from 1967 to 2025, limited to English-language studies. Search terms included "pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome", "positive end-expiratory pressure", "PEEP", "positive-pressure respiration", "mechanical ventilation", "pressure-volume curves", "electrical impedance tomography", "esophageal manometry", "stress index", and "ventilator-induced lung injury". Reference lists from key publications and guidelines were also screened. Key Content and Findings: Among available strategies, utilization of the low PEEP:FiO Conclusions: Evidence supports maintaining PEEP at or above ARDSNet lower-table recommendations with close attention to physiologic response. Adjunctive monitoring with esophageal manometry or EIT may help balance recruitment and overdistension, but pediatric-specific trials are needed to define best practice. Standardized multicenter studies will be essential to establish evidence-based PEEP strategies in PARDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.