ArticleGlobal & regional health technology assessment
Italian Medicines Agency's reform and time until pricing and reimbursement decisions: a time-to-event analysis.
Article in Global & regional health technology assessment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comments on: Italian Medicines Agency's reform and time until pricing and reimbursement decisions: a time-to-event analysis.Global & regional health technology assessmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The duration of pricing and reimbursement (P&R) negotiations is a key performance indicator for medicines agencies in universal health coverage systems. In early 2024, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) underwent a major reform, including the merging of the previous Scientific-Technical Committee and Price and Reimbursement Committee into a single Scientific and Economic Committee. This study evaluates the reform's impact on time to P&R determinations for new medicines in Italy. Methods: A time-to-event analysis was conducted on 139 new chemical entities authorized by the European Commission (EC) between February 2021 and December 2023. The primary outcome was the time from marketing authorization (MA) to publication of AIFA's P&R determination. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare reclassification hazards between pre- (before March 2024) and post-reform groups of medicinal products, based on a fixed separation date, adjusting for antineoplastic therapeutic area and pharmaceutical company size. Four sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the results. Results: The multivariate Cox model, adjusting for antineoplastics, products from major corporations, and orphan medicines, showed that the reform was associated with an 84% increase in reclassification hazards (HR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.20-2.82, p = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses corroborated these findings, showing even greater improvements when focusing on national evaluation timeframes (HR = 11.57 and HR = 3.91). Conclusion: The consolidation of separate committees into a unified structure, as a part of the 2024 AIFA reform, was accompanied by accelerated P&R negotiations for new medicines in Italy, demonstrating that structural optimization of health technology assessment processes may enhance system efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.