ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Lessons from history: mass mobilization and public health campaigns in China's anti-schistosomiasis efforts (1950s-1980s).
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease (NTD) that posed a major public health challenge in China, with approximately 11.6 million people infected in 1949. This scoping review systematically examines the mass mobilization practices of China's anti-schistosomiasis campaign during the 1950s-1960s and traces epidemiological outcomes through the early 1980s. Methods: Following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, data were collected from government documents, academic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI), and historical archives. Narrative synthesis and SWOT analysis were employed to evaluate the mass mobilization model. Results: Despite 80% rural illiteracy and severe resource constraints, China mobilized millions of peasants through high-level political commitment, multi-sectoral coordination, integration of disease control with agricultural production, and culturally adapted health communication. These efforts contributed to reducing infected cases from 11.6 million to below 1 million by approximately 1982-1983 (>90% decline). However, SWOT analysis revealed inherent limitations: weak grassroots technical capacity, unsustainable campaign-style mechanisms, and formalism that compromised surveillance accuracy, leading to disease resurgence in some areas. Conclusion: Political mobilization and community participation can partially compensate for limited medical resources, but effective interventions require balancing mass participation with scientific professionalism and establishing institutionalized mechanisms. These historical lessons remain relevant for contemporary NTD elimination, "One Health" practices, and public health emergency responses, though application requires consideration of contextual differences across countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.