ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
From knowledge to collective action: a peer-led model for climate and health leadership.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of climate change are increasingly impacting population health, yet most health professionals lack training in communication, advocacy, and systems-level leadership. This paper describes the Climate and Health Peer Learning Circle (PLC), a national, community-based leadership program developed by the Climate Advocacy Lab to strengthen health professional capacity for climate-responsive education and advocacy. Using a peer learning and practice-based model, the PLC supports participants to develop skills in narrative strategy, relational organizing, strategic communication, and applied advocacy. This manuscript presents the program's conceptual framework, curriculum design, and implementation across four regional cohorts in 2025, and summarizes practice-based feedback gathered through surveys, coaching sessions, and participant reflection. While not a formal research evaluation, findings suggest that participants increased their confidence and applied skills and used PLC strategies to advance climate and health initiatives in clinical, community, and professional settings. The PLC demonstrates the potential of relational, peer informed models to move beyond knowledge acquisition and support health professionals as credible communicators and civic leaders within the climate and health movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.