ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Retinal Predictors of Visual Outcome and Recurrence in Naïve Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization Patients.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To identify predictive factors for recurrence and to assess variables influencing visual acuity over time. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 137 eyes of 128 patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections (ranibizumab or aflibercept) between June 2017 and June 2022, with a minimum 12-month follow-up. The study cohort was divided into two groups: The recurrence (R) group, which included eyes that experienced a recurrence of mCNV activity, and the nonrecurrence (NR) group, which included eyes without recurrence. Results: The R group consisted of 56 eyes, whereas the NR group included 81 eyes. Recurrence was significantly associated with lower baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.95; Conclusions: Baseline clinical and imaging biomarkers are significantly associated with both recurrence risk and visual outcomes in mCNV. Early identification of these predictive factors may guide treatment strategies and optimize long-term visual prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.