Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41982814›Full record

ArticleNeurology open access2025

Predicting CSF α-Synuclein Seed Amplification Assay Status From Demographics and Clinical Data.

Charles S Venuto, Konnor Herbst, Lana Chahine, Karl D Kieburtz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology open access, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charles S VenutoCenter for Health + Technology, University of Rochester.
Konnor HerbstCenter for Health + Technology, University of Rochester.
Lana ChahineDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh.
Karl D KieburtzCenter for Health + Technology, University of Rochester.

Funding

The Clinical Core will support in-person and virtual research visits for three of the four Research Projects at the University of Rochester Udall CenterP50NS108676 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DORSEY, EARL RAY · 2018 to 2022
$9.2M
NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS108676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: The alpha-synuclein (α-syn) cerebrospinal fluid seed amplification assay (CSF SAA) presents a promising diagnostic for Parkinson's disease (PD) and other synucleinopathies. The objective of this study was to develop and externally validate models to predict probabilities of α-syn positive or negative status in vivo in a mixture of people with and without PD using easily accessible clinical predictors. Methods: Uni- and multi-variable logistic regression models were developed in a cohort of participants from the Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI) study to predict CSF α-syn status as measured by SAA. Models were externally validated in a cohort of participants from the Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study (S4) that had also measured CSF α-syn status using SAA. Results: The PPMI model training/testing cohort included 1260 participants, 37% of whom were female, and a mean (± standard deviation) age of 62.4 (±10.0) years. Among them, 76% had manifest PD with a mean disease duration of 1.2 (±1.6) years. Overall, 68.7% of the overall PPMI cohort (and 88.0% with PD of those with manifest PD) had positive CSF α-syn SAA status results. Variables from the full multivariable model to predict CSF α-syn SAA status included age- and sex-specific University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) percentile values, sex, self-reported frequency of constipation problems, leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 ( Conclusion: Data-driven models using non-invasive clinical features can accurately predict CSF α-syn SAA positive and negative status in cohorts enriched for people living with PD. Scores from the UPSIT were highly significant in predicting α-syn SAA status.

Indexed as

[ 165 ] Parkinson’s disease/Parkinsonism[ 17 ] Prognosis[ 23 ] Clinical trials Observational study (Cohort, Case control)

Identifiers

PMID41982814
PMCPMC13075382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.