ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Why Low-Risk Primiparous Women Opt for Cesarean Section: A Social Media Perspective.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To identify the key factors influencing the decision of low-risk primiparous women to opt for cesarean section (CS), and to provide empirical evidence for optimizing maternal health interventions and reducing unnecessary CS intention. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among low-risk primiparous women who had no medical indications for CS. A total of 459 valid questionnaires were obtained through stratified sampling. SmartPLS software was used to conduct structural equation modeling (SEM) and multigroup analysis (MGA) to examine the relationship between social media exposure and cesarean section intention, the mediating effects of social norm and self-efficacy, and the model's stability across demographic subgroups. Results: Social media exposure directly and positively predicted cesarean section intention (β = 0.260, p < 0.001). Social media exposure also showed significant indirect associations with cesarean section intention mediated through social norm (β = 0.164, p < 0.001) and self-efficacy (β = 0.074, p < 0.001). Furthermore, multigroup analysis indicated that while the overall mediation framework remained stable, specific influence pathways exhibited significant variations across age and occupational groups. Conclusion: This study clarifies the underlying mechanisms through which social media exposure shapes cesarean section intention. These findings provide empirical evidence to inform targeted maternal health interventions, optimize digital health communication, and support evidence-based childbirth decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.