Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41982794›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026

Cesarean Section Overuse, Clinical Decision-Making, and Patient Trust in Somalia's Predominantly Private Maternal Health System: A Commentary on Quality, Equity, and the Human Experience of Birth.

Nasteho Mohamud Mudei, Abdullahi Abdirahman Omar, Falis Elmi Abdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nasteho Mohamud MudeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Sumait Hospital, SIMAD University, Mogadishu, Somalia.ORCID 0009-0002-2744-9230
Abdullahi Abdirahman OmarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr. Sumait Hospital, SIMAD University, Mogadishu, Somalia.ORCID 0000-0003-3295-8339
Falis Elmi AbdiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SIMAD University, Mogadishu, Somalia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cesarean section is an essential obstetric intervention when clinically indicated, but global rates have risen markedly, raising concerns about overuse, inequities, and misaligned incentives in some settings. Somalia represents a fragile health system context in which cesarean decision-making occurs within a predominantly private maternity sector shaped by variable governance, uneven intrapartum monitoring capacity, and high out-of-pocket costs. This commentary synthesizes published literature and institutional reports, together with contextual clinical experience, to examine drivers of cesarean escalation, community perceptions of decision-making, and the implications for trust, autonomy, respectful care, and equity. It argues that improving childbirth outcomes in Somalia requires a balanced approach that protects timely access to life-saving cesarean section while reducing avoidable surgery through better documentation, clearer communication, strengthened intrapartum assessment, and feasible quality-improvement measures.

Indexed as

cesarean sectionCTG interpretationmaternal healthobstetric decision-makingprivate health facilitiesquality of carerespectful maternity careSomalia

Identifiers

PMID41982794
PMCPMC13071816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.