ArticleHealth science reports2026
Explainability Challenges in Medical AI: The Conceptual Hidden Cost of Machine Learning Preprocessing.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Data preprocessing is a significant step in machine learning to improve the performance of the model and decreases the running time. This might include dealing with missing values, outliers' removal, data augmentation, dimensionality reduction and handling the confounding variables. Objective: This commentary explores the common preprocessing steps used in medical machine learning and highlights their conceptual hidden cost including reduced model explainability and clinical interpretability. This commentary focuses on conceptual rather than empirical implications of these preprocessing decisions. Methods: Literature review was undertaken to explore the data preprocessing steps in machine learning. Results: Although it is found the preprocessing steps improve the accuracy of the model, but they might block new findings and hinder the explainability of the model if they are not carefully considered especially in medicine. We identify key risks such as bias introduction and over simplification and outline mitigation strategies. Conclusion: The novelty of this work lies in systematically connecting preprocessing practices with explainability challenges in healthcare artificial intelligence and suggesting approaches to balance performance with explainability. This highlights the need for careful design of preprocessing pipelines in medical artificial intelligence systems to ensure both reliable predictions and clinical trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.