Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41982758›Full record

SynthesisDrug design, development and therapy2026

Film-Forming Gels for Topical Drug Delivery: A Systematic Review of the Effects of Formulation on Film Performance, Drug Release, and Skin Permeation.

Ferdy Firmansyah, Arif Budiman, Muchtaridi Muchtaridi, Lutfi Chabib, Fauzia Ningrum Syaputri, Fauzan Afandi, Khaled M Elamin, Ahmed Fouad Abdelwahab Mohammed, Nasrul Wathoni

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ferdy FirmansyahDoctoral Program of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-1381-0486
Arif BudimanDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia.
Muchtaridi MuchtaridiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-6156-8025
Lutfi ChabibDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Fauzia Ningrum SyaputriDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-3824-2879
Fauzan AfandiDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0009-0006-0861-9598
Khaled M ElaminGraduated School of Pharmaceutical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9555-1814
Ahmed Fouad Abdelwahab MohammedDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Nasrul WathoniDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5985-6909

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Film-forming gels (FFGs) are increasingly recognized as a medium for topical drug delivery. However, existing evidence correlating specific formulation characteristics with drug delivery efficacy remains fragmented across many studies and is only partially organized. This systematic review aimed to consolidate these findings into a single framework and examine how important formulation variables affect three main outcome domains: film characteristics, drug release behavior, and skin permeation. A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus was conducted until October 2025, adhering to the PRISMA criteria. Studies were included if they examined topical FFG formulations and reported at least one of the predetermined outcomes. A total of 27 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, with solvent evaporation identified as the predominant method for FFG preparation. Across this body of research, the selection and relative ratio of polymers and plasticizers have consistently emerged as critical determinants influencing drying time (<15 min), mechanical strength, flexibility, and bioadhesive properties of the film on the skin. Most formulations released the drug slowly over approximately 8-48 hours. In studies that measured permeation, FFGs usually exhibited a higher flux and/or better drug retention in the skin than regular topical formulations. The film's ability to block the skin and the use of penetration enhancers in the matrix are thought to cause these effects. In summary, these results show that FFGs are a flexible and customizable formulation platform, where the film's characteristics, release rate, and skin penetration are all strongly linked to the composition's design. To obtain this technology with clearer therapeutic benefits, we need to employ Quality by Design principles more widely and have more consistent evaluation methodologies across studies.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsSkinSkin AbsorptionAdministration, CutaneousAdministration, TopicalAnimalsChemistry, PharmaceuticalDrug LiberationGelsHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsGelsPharmaceutical Preparationsdrug releasefilm-forming gelsfilm propertiesskin permeationtopical drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID41982758
PMCPMC13071019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.