ArticleAdvances in social sciences and management2026
24-hour Movement Behaviors in Minority Children from Low-income Families in the U.S.
Article in Advances in social sciences and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: We examined adherence to the 24-hr movement guidelines in a sample of primarily African American children from low-income families in the U.S. Secondly, we examined how parental practices and the screen environment within the home related to child health behaviors. Methods: 48 families completed questionnaires regarding child screen time, sleep, and parental practices/screen environment within the home. Children's moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was assessed using Actigraphs. Adherence to guidelines was calculated as a percentage of the population who met guidelines, and differences MVPA, screen time, and sleep were examined between children from families with and without screen time rules and between children who did and did not have access to screens in the room where they slept. Results: One child (3%) met all 24-hour movement recommendations during the week, and 7 children (26%) met all on the weekend. Children with access to screens where theft slept had more weekday screen time than children without access to screens (p<0.05). Children with screen time rules engaged in more MVPA on weekdays than children without rules (p<0.05). Conclusion: Children mostly failed to meet guidelines. Parental practices and home screen environment influenced children's movement behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.