ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026
A Systematic Literature Review on Integrated Deep Learning and Multiagent Vision-Language Frameworks for Pathology Image Analysis and Report Generation.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic literature review investigates the integration of deep learning (DL), vision-language models (VLMs), and multiagent systems in the analysis of pathology images and automated report generation. The rapid advancement of whole-slide imaging (WSI) technologies has posed new challenges in pathology, especially due to the scale and complexity of the data. DL techniques in general and convolutional neural networks and transformers in particular have substantially enhanced image analysis tasks including segmentation, classification, and detection. However, these models often lack generalizability to generate coherent, clinically relevant text, thus necessitating the integration of VLMs and large language models (LLMs). This review examines the effectiveness of VLMs and LLMs in bridging the gap between visual data and clinical text, focusing on their potential for automating the generation of pathology reports. Additionally, multiagent systems, which leverage specialized artificial intelligence (AI) agents to collaboratively perform diagnostic tasks, are explored for their contributions to improving diagnostic accuracy and scalability. Through a synthesis of recent studies, this review highlights the successes, challenges, and future directions of these AI technologies in pathology diagnostics, offering a comprehensive foundation for the development of integrated, AI-driven diagnostic workflows.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.