Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41982645›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2026

The Diabetes Staging System (DSS): A Pilot Study Assessing Feasibility, Provider Engagement and Implementation Challenges of a Novel Staging System for Type 2 Diabetes.

Moahad S Dar, Junhong Zhang, Anna Ashline, Swetha Kota, Sandra Woolson, Nadya T Majette, Hayden B Bosworth

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06142006 (A Pilot Study to Test the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Novel Diabetes Staging System in Patient Aligned Care Teams in the Durham VA System), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06142006 unknown statusnot on this map

A Pilot Study to Test the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Novel Diabetes Staging System in Patient Aligned Care Teams in the Durham VA System

TypeobservationalSponsorDurham VA Medical CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 DiabetesArmsDiabetes Staging System (DSS) use among Primary Care Teams
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Moahad S DarDepartment of Medicine, Greenville VA Healthcare Center, Greenville, NC, USA.
Junhong ZhangDepartment of Primary Care, Greenville VA Healthcare Center, Greenville, NC, USA.
Anna AshlineDepartment of Primary Care, Greenville VA Healthcare Center, Greenville, NC, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-3392-3833
Swetha KotaDepartment of Biostatistics, Institute of Medical Research (IMR), Durham, NC, USA.
Sandra WoolsonDepartment of Biostatistics, Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) at Department of Veteran Affairs, Durham, NC,USA.
Nadya T MajetteDepartment of Medicine, Greenville VA Healthcare Center, Greenville, NC, USA.
Hayden B BosworthDepartment of Population Health Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6188-9825

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Type 2 diabetes (DM2) currently lacks a standardized staging system that can be used to predict survival and guide providers towards guideline concordant care much like TNM staging does for cancer. We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility, provider engagement and implementation challenges of the DSS and examined if guideline concordant care improved especially SGLT2i/GLP-1a use in Veterans DM2 patients with cardiorenal disease. Methods: A 6-month pilot study implemented DSS in VA primary care clinics between December 2023-September 2024. Study visits were at baseline and 6 months. Primary outcome: the initiation of SGLT2i/GLP-1a in Veteran DM2 patients with CVD/CKD compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes: weight, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1C, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and medication adherence compared to baseline. Inclusion criteria: Male or female Veterans between the ages of 18-75 years with DM2 and ≥1 CV event and/or CKD and not on SGLT2i/GLP-1a. Exclusion criteria: Veterans with contraindications to SGLT2i/GLP-1 and/or a serious mental health disorder. Results: After baseline visit, all providers prescribed to 14/14 patients at least one of the medications with 12/14 prescribed SGLT2i and 2/14 prescribed GLP-1a. We found 13/14 (93%) patients to still be on at least one of the medications at 6 months. At 6 months compared to baseline, weight (216 lbs. ± 41 → 213 lbs. ± 39), blood pressure (141/76 ± 20/10 → 132/73 ± 17/10), A1C (7.7% ± 1.5% → 7.4% ± 0.8%) modestly decreased but GFR remained stable (64 mL/min ± 17 → 64 mL/min ± 19). Medication adherence was continued for all 13 patients (Medication possession ratio was ≥80%). Conclusion: DSS use was associated with increased SGLT2i/GLP-1a prescribing by VA primary care providers and medication adherence in Veterans DM2 patients with CVD/CKD. The DSS could help improve cardiorenal outcomes and guideline concordant in their DM2 patients in the future if larger studies can validate these findings. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT06142006.

Indexed as

GLP-1ahealthcare deliverySGLT2itype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID41982645
PMCPMC13075421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.