ArticleDigital health
Experiences of specialist physicians with e-consultations.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An e-consultation is a form of virtual asynchronous communication between a primary care provider (PCP) and specialist physician within a shared electronic health record (EHR), designed to improve communication and timely access to specialized care. Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) initiated a province wide e-consult service in 2018 which continues today, used by PCPs and specialists working in the provincial health care system. Objectives: The focus of this observational study is to explore the experiences of specialists who have utilized the NL e-consult system. Methods: The study method was a mixed method survey. An anonymous, web-based questionnaire was sent to specialist physicians working in NL who participated in the e-consult service between January 2018 and December 2022. Results: Thirty-six specialists completed the e-questionnaire, with a 55% response rate (36/66). The majority were internal medicine specialists (53%), followed by surgical subspecialities (16%), psychiatrists (11%), and other (19%). Most respondents agreed there was a role for e-consults in the health care system. However, almost all respondents (90%) indicated they had no protected clinical time for completing e-consults. Moreover, 92% indicated e-consults were answered outside of regular working hours at least some of the time. About half (47%) replied they spent 1 h or less per week answering e-consults, while 30% indicated it was 2-3 h per week. Only 44% of physicians were financially reimbursed for completing e-consults. Conclusion: The e-consult system has been successfully introduced within the provincial health care in NL. However, issues of dedicated time for e-consults and adequate financial compensation may limit its sustainability in the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.