Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41982619›Full record

ReviewMediastinum (Hong Kong, China)2026

Management of liver metastases secondary to thymic epithelial tumors: a narrative review of current management and future directions.

Alex J Ma, Erica S Alexander

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alex J MaCity College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Erica S AlexanderDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Hepatic metastases secondary to thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), encompassing thymomas and thymic carcinomas (TCs), are a rare but clinically meaningful phenomenon and are associated with worse overall survival (OS). Management of liver metastases is largely limited to systemic therapy and chemotherapeutic regimens; although, there are smaller-scale studies in the literature reporting use of more novel treatment regimens and liver-directed therapies. The purpose of this article is to explore management options for TET hepatic metastases, including novel therapeutic options. Methods: A review of the available electronic literature was performed through October 10, 2025, using PubMed and Google Scholar. A single author identified the studies, and both authors reviewed the selection to determine which studies to include. Key Content and Findings: The literature involving systemic therapy options was much more developed, as this is the first-line treatment option for TET hepatic metastases. Smaller series supporting the use of surgical resection, radiation therapy, and interventional radiology therapies suggest benefit in liver-directed resection and/or therapies. Conclusions: Data evaluating therapeutic options for managing liver metastases secondary to TETs is limited. Given the prognostic implications of these metastatic lesions, a broader understanding of available therapies is essential for determining optimal management.

Indexed as

Hepatic metastasesthymic carcinoma (TC)thymoma

Identifiers

PMID41982619
PMCPMC13071623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.