ArticleCureus2026
Immunohistochemical Expression of MLH1 and MSH2 in Colorectal Carcinoma and Its Correlation With Clinicopathological Parameters.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is a major health problem worldwide and is one of the top causes of cancer deaths. Defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) are responsible for a few cases of CRC, and the defect mainly involves MLH1 and MSH2, which leads to microsatellite instability (MSI). Finding MMR deficiency is important for predicting outcomes, screening for hereditary conditions like Lynch syndrome, and choosing treatments such as immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, there is limited data on MMR protein expression and its clinical associations in Indian patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of mismatch proteins MLH1 and MSH2 in colorectal carcinoma, and to correlate MLH1 and MSH2 expression with clinicopathological parameters such as age, gender, tumor site, histological type of tumor, and histological grade. Materials and methods This retrospective cross-sectional study included 45 histologically confirmed cases of CRC. Immunohistochemical staining for MLH1 and MSH2 was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Complete absence of nuclear staining in tumor cells, with intact internal controls, was interpreted as loss of expression, indicating MMR deficiency and MSI. Retained expression of both proteins was interpreted as MMR-proficient based on MLH1 and MSH2 expression, although complete assessment of microsatellite instability ideally requires evaluation of all four mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2). Statistical analysis was performed to determine correlations with clinicopathological variables such as age, gender, tumor site, histological type, and histological grade. Results The mean patient age was 56 ± 14 years. The majority of patients (n=27, 60%) were female. The colon was the most common tumor site (n=25, 55.6%), and conventional adenocarcinoma was the main type (n=44, 97.8%). Most tumors were moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas, comprising 35 (77.8%) patients. Overall, 21 patients (46.7%) were classified as MSI (MMR-deficient), while 24 (53.3%) were MSS (MMR-proficient). MLH1 loss occurred in 19 (42.2%) patients, and MSH2 loss in nine (20%). MLH1 loss was significantly linked to patients under 50 years of age (p = 0.009). MSH2 expression did not show a significant correlation with clinical or pathological factors. Conclusion Many CRC cases in this study showed loss of MLH1 and/or MSH2, which suggests MMR deficiency and MSI. MLH1 loss was closely linked to early-onset CRC and may point to a hereditary risk. Regular testing for MMR proteins can help with diagnosis, screening for Lynch syndrome, and choosing the best treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.