ReviewCureus2026
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Parkinson's Disease: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal stromal cells in age-related neurodegenerative disorders: mechanisms, translational barriers, and precision strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a gradual neurodegenerative condition characterized by dopaminergic neuron death, α-synuclein pathology, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Current treatments (levodopa, deep brain stimulation (DBS), etc.) are mainly symptomatic and have limited effect on slowing disease progression. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are emerging candidates for a disease-modifying approach because they can modulate both the adaptive and innate immune responses, secreting neurotrophic and pro-angiogenic factors, affecting glial phenotype, and delivering extracellular vesicles/exosomes, which may lessen neuroinflammation and/or proteotoxic stress. Early-phase clinical research (phase 1 dose escalation of intravenous (IV) allogeneic bone marrow (BM)-derived MSCs; recent phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled IV allogeneic MSC trials) indicates that MSCs may be feasible and safe in the short term, although these have demonstrated some symptomatic benefits in motor outcomes. However, notable variability exists across dosing regimens, and significant placebo effects were observed. In this review, we summarize the sources of MSCs, relevant mechanisms of MSC activity in PD biology (including preclinical evidence), clinical trial results, safety issues, routes of administration, and challenges (including potency assays, batch variation, endpoint selection, durability, and regulatory/ethical limitations). We conclude that MSC-based interventions in PD remain investigational, and future clinical trials should focus on standardizing manufacturing processes, utilizing robust potency metrics, incorporating biomarker-rich designs, and selecting clinically meaningful endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.