ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of beta-thalassemia disease using digital PCR.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To evaluate the performance of digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) as a non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) for assessing the risk of the fetus being affected by beta-thalassemia major and beta-thalassemia/Hb E disease. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 63 pregnant women from couples at risk of having a fetus with severe beta-thalassemia (homozygous beta-thalassemia or beta-thalassemia/Hb E disease), who underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis between January and September 2024. Maternal plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was analyzed using dPCR to detect and quantify the paternally inherited beta-thalassemia allele (PIB) and maternally inherited beta-thalassemia (MIB) alleles. Invasive prenatal diagnosis (chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, or cordocentesis) served as the gold standard for fetal genotype confirmation via multiplex PCR and high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis. The mutant/normal (M/N) allele ratio was calculated, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the optimal cut-off for predicting affected fetuses. Results: Among 54 couples with discordant mutations, PIB was identified in 25 cases. An MIB-M/N ratio cut-off of ≥0.919 yielded a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 81.2% for predicting fetal inheritance of MIB allele (AUC = 0.938). In nine couples with identical mutations, an M/N ratio of ≥1.043 predicted affected fetuses with both 100% sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: dPCR-based NIPT accurately identifies fetuses at risk of beta-thalassemia major, potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures and associated risks. The relatively small sample size could limit the generalizability of the findings. Larger studies involving more participants from different ethnic and geographical backgrounds would provide more robust data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.