ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Case report of a mature cystic teratoma in the tail of the pancreas in a 54-year-old male.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Cystic Teratoma of Pancreas. Diagnostic Challenge and Therapeutic Management].Acta gastroenterologica LatinoamericanaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic dermoid cyst (also referred to as mature cystic teratoma) is a rare, histologically well-differentiated benign germ cell tumor. Preoperative definitive diagnosis remains challenging due to the absence of specific imaging features and reliable serum tumor markers. Case description: We present a case of a 54-year-old male patient in whom a cystic low-density lesion, measuring 3.08 cm × 2.82 cm × 2.82 cm with predominantly well-defined margins and relatively homogeneous density, was incidentally detected in the pancreatic tail during a routine physical examination. Preoperative imaging assessment indicated a cystic neoplasm; however, its benign or malignant nature could not be definitively ascertained. The initial preoperative plan under general anesthesia included laparoscopic exploration and abdominal mass resection, with a contingency plan for combined distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. During the operation, the chief surgeon observed with the naked eye that the mass had a complete capsule and was only closely adhered to the tail of the pancreas, making it easy to resection. Therefore, the surgery was adjusted to laparoscopic pancreatic lesion resection combined with percutaneous abdominal drainage. Postoperative pathological examination confirmed it to be a cystic mature teratoma. Given the potential malignant risk associated with such lesions, regular postoperative imaging follow-up was scheduled to evaluate treatment outcomes. To date, the patient has completed over 10 months of postoperative follow-up with no evidence of recurrence. Conclusion: Pancreatic dermoid cysts are extremely rare, and their diagnosis depends on postoperative pathological examination. Although preoperative confirmation remains challenging, this retrospective study underscores the diagnostic difficulties in imaging-based evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions and systematically summarizes the current research advances and conceptual framework regarding these uncommon tumors. The findings may help prevent unnecessary extensive surgical resections resulting from misdiagnosis of pancreatic primary cystic neoplasms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.